Score privately
Answer eight focused data-trust statements before anyone else influences your view.
Compare how pricing and merchandising see the same live program. Surface the gaps worth investigating before another tool, renewal, or reorganization.
Eight statements · Data trust only · Useful solo, stronger together
What to expect
Private by default
Your internal scores are not public content.
Vendor-agnostic
Examine the operating program, not a software pitch.
Careful claims
Differences are signals to discuss, not proof someone is wrong.
From opinion to evidence
The exercise creates a structured conversation around one live program—without collapsing distinct views into one tidy average.
Answer eight focused data-trust statements before anyone else influences your view.
Invite a merchandising counterpart and keep each perspective visible instead of averaging disagreement away.
Connect the largest gaps to a recent recommendation, override, promotion, or execution decision.
Turn signals into a practical investigation or expand the work across all six adoption dimensions.
Fictional comparison
Illustrative scores—not customer findings
Pricing 4 · Merchandising 2
Pricing 3 · Merchandising 3
The useful question
“Which recent decision explains the difference?”
Agreement can be a strength—or a shared blind spot. GapSignal keeps the evidence discussion at the center.
Offers
Choose the depth that matches the decision in front of your team.
Pricing Reality Check
A focused data-trust exercise for one leader or two colleagues comparing the same program.
Clear scope, honest interpretation
One program. Two perspectives.
Complete the eight statements privately, invite one colleague, and use the differences to start a better operating conversation.